The future of air travel is facing tough questions, especially as climate change becomes a top concern. Experts warn sustainable aviation fuel’s on a long haul flight path, meaning progress is happening—but much slower than expected. In the U.S., a country with one of the busiest skies in the world, the urgency to switch from fossil fuels to greener solutions like sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is growing every day. Yet, the aviation industry still faces big hurdles. While SAF adoption has gained attention, supply, cost, and technology gaps are making it hard to scale in time.
Unlike electric cars, airplanes can’t easily switch to batteries. That’s why low-carbon aviation fuel is being seen as one of the few near-term solutions. But as the experts say, the U.S. has a long road ahead. Let’s explore what sustainable aviation fuel really is, how it works, and why scaling it matters more now than ever.
What Is Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)?
Sustainable aviation fuel, also called renewable jet fuel, is made from eco-friendly sources like cooking oil, animal fats, algae, and even leftover farm crops. Unlike regular jet fuel made from petroleum, SAF produces up to 80% less carbon emissions when used. That makes it a cleaner choice for the environment. What’s even more impressive is that it can be used in today’s aircraft engines without needing any changes. Airlines don’t need new planes or engines to fly with SAF, which is a huge advantage.
But SAF is not just a type of fuel—it’s a promise. It’s a way for the aviation world to fight climate change without grounding planes. As of now, SAF accounts for less than 1% of all aviation fuel used globally. In the U.S., efforts to increase this are happening, but slowly. The technology is there. The challenge is making enough of it, and making it affordable.
Why Is SAF Considered Essential for Greener Skies?
The aviation industry is responsible for about 2–3% of global carbon emissions. In the U.S. alone, commercial flights release nearly 800 million metric tons of CO₂ each year. That’s a serious environmental cost. While planes are becoming more fuel-efficient, emissions are still rising as more people fly. This is where SAF steps in. It can cut greenhouse gases by a large margin, helping airlines meet net-zero goals set by groups like the FAA and the Department of Energy.
The U.S. government has acknowledged that aviation decarbonization is not possible without cleaner fuel. It’s not just about being green. It’s also about staying competitive. Airlines that use green flight solutions are more likely to win public trust and meet future rules. SAF allows flights to stay in the air, while doing less damage to the climate.
Current Production & Supply Chain Realities
Right now, there are only a few plants making SAF in the U.S., and even those can’t produce enough to meet the growing demand. Companies like Neste, Gevo, and World Energy are trying to ramp up production, but the supply chain is still weak. SAF needs to be refined, stored, transported, and blended with regular jet fuel before it reaches an airport. That makes things more complicated.
Look at this table to understand how small SAF production is compared to demand:
| Year | U.S. SAF Production (Million Gallons) | Estimated Demand (Million Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 15 | 4,200 |
| 2023 | 25 | 4,800 |
| 2030 (Goal) | 3,000 | 6,000+ |
The gap is wide. Without better renewable fuel infrastructure, SAF output can’t grow fast enough. This weak link in the chain must be fixed to make a real difference.
Cost Barriers and Industry Challenges
Money is one of the biggest problems. Sustainable aviation fuel is expensive—often 2 to 4 times the cost of regular jet fuel. Airlines already work on thin profits, so many are unwilling or unable to pay the extra price unless they’re forced by law or offered government support. Smaller carriers feel the pain even more than large airlines.
There are also limits on feedstock availability—the raw materials used to make SAF. Algae, waste oil, and bio-materials sound great in theory, but they’re hard to get in the amounts needed for large-scale production. Plus, biofuel logistics require special handling and facilities. Experts warn that unless these economic and technical issues are addressed quickly, biofuel price disparity will slow down adoption even further.
Who’s Leading and Who’s Lagging Behind?
Some U.S. airlines are pushing forward. Delta, United, and American Airlines have all announced SAF agreements. United Airlines, for example, has partnered with producers to buy over 3 billion gallons of SAF by 2030. That’s a bold move, but it still covers only a fraction of their total fuel use.
States like California are supporting SAF with local policies and clean fuel programs. On the other hand, other regions are barely involved. Meanwhile, European airlines and some in Asia-Pacific are ahead of the U.S. They’ve already started blending SAF at a higher percentage and benefit from stronger climate laws.
So, while the U.S. talks about SAF, other countries are already flying with it. Closing this SAF adoption gap will take leadership, both from airlines and from Washington.
Can SAF Actually Scale in Time to Make a Difference?
That’s the biggest question. The U.S. government has launched the SAF Grand Challenge—a plan to produce 3 billion gallons per year by 2030 and 35 billion by 2050. But experts say those numbers are ambitious and likely out of reach at current speeds. There are not enough plants, not enough feedstocks, and not enough money flowing in.
The idea of sustainable aviation fuel’s on a long haul flight path means this journey will take decades, not years. The aviation industry needs time, support, and a lot of investment to catch up. Without serious acceleration, SAF may fall short of meeting climate targets and hopes of fuel transition will fade away.
Alternative Tech: Hydrogen, Electric, or Carbon Capture?
While SAF is the main focus today, other options are being tested. Hydrogen aircraft and electric planes are in development, but they’re still far from commercial use. Battery-powered planes work for short trips only. For long flights, there’s no alternative better than SAF right now. That’s why experts call it the best option for the future of aviation fuel, even if it’s not perfect.
Carbon capture technologies may help offset emissions, but they don’t reduce the fuel used. So for now, SAF remains the most realistic and scalable solution—if it gets the right backing.
What Can U.S. Policymakers & Industry Do Right Now?
There are ways to fix the problem. The U.S. can give tax credits for SAF producers and buyers. It can support public-private partnerships that build plants and pipelines. More research and development is needed to find new feedstocks that are cheaper and easier to grow. Better rules from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) can push the industry forward.
States can help too. Places like California show how clean fuel regulation can create markets and build demand. By offering aviation fuel tax credits, governments can lower the price and encourage faster growth. If airlines know they’ll be supported, they’ll invest more in aviation decarbonization efforts.
A Long Road Ahead, But the Flight Must Continue
Experts warn sustainable aviation fuel’s on a long haul flight path, but that doesn’t mean it’s not moving. The U.S. has the tools, talent, and technology to lead. What it needs is action. Faster, bigger, and smarter moves by both the government and the industry. Public pressure and passenger awareness also matter. If people ask for a green aviation push, airlines will have to listen.
Change won’t happen overnight, but with the right flight plan, it will happen. The skies can stay busy—and cleaner, too.
Read our previous article: What fuels powerful winds? Answers from a weather scientist